Follow the Money
From Sam Stein on The Huffington Post:
Opponents of the Employee Free Choice Act are actively pushing a new non-partisan study showing that the lead sponsor of the legislation, Senator Tom Harkin (D-Iowa), received more donations from the labor sector ($1.64 million) since 1989 than any of his colleagues.
The findings, compiled by the Center for Responsive Politics, drive home the classic, cynical, premise that politics is determined by quid-pro-quos. But if that is the standard being set for this debate, then EFCA's foes have a far more daunting fight on their hands.
That's because some of the legislation's chief opponents in Congress have received millions upon millions of dollars from business interests over the course of their careers, and only a pittance from labor. This includes the top ranks of the Republican Party.
After the Employee Free Choice Act was introduced on Tuesday, Danny Diaz, a Republican operative working against the legislation's passage, sent to reporters a compilation of quotes attacking the union-backed measure. Below are the names of the officials quoted with a list of the amount of money they've received from business and labor political action committees.
Sen. Lamar Alexander -- since 2002 $2.79 million from business Political Action Committees (82 percent of PAC donations) $15,000 from labor PACS (statistically, zero percent)House Minority Leader John Boehner - since 1989
$7.48 million from business PACS (94 percent)
$200,000 from labor (three percent)Minority Whip Eric Cantor - since 2000
$5.34 million from business PACS (93 percent)
$42,500 from labor PACS (one percent)Sen. John Ensign - since 1994
$5.4 million from business PACS (86 percent)
$59,200 from labor PACS (one percent)Sen. Mike Enzi - since 1996
$3 million from business PACS (89 percent)
$37,500 from labor PACS (one percent)Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell - since 1989
$7.79 million from business PACS (87 percent)
$43,750 from labor PACS (zero percent)Rep. Buck McKeon - since 1992
$2.2 million from business PACS (90 percent)
$112,00 from labor PACS (five percent)Rep. Joe Pitts - since 1996
$1.39 million from business PACS (91 percent)
$32,000 from labor PACS (two percent)Sen. John Thune - since 1996
$2.5 million from business PACS (71 percent)
$12,000 from labor PACS (zero percent)* The figures are estimations taken from the Center for Responsive Politics
To be sure, not all business groups are actively engaged in the EFCA fight. Some, though relatively few, are comfortable with the legislation's passage. Moreover, there is a far deeper pool of business PACs willing to donate to politicians than labor ones. But this line of attack only adds to the notion that the business community is bringing more financial clout to the fight. Indeed, the Chamber of Commerce -- the leading force behind killing EFCA in Congress -- spent more on lobbying in 2008 than all labor unions combined. The source of that information: the Center for Responsive Politics.
In fact, the most telling statistic about how skewed this fight actually is might just come from the same study that EFCA's opponents now quote. Since 1989, Harkin -- the lead sponsor of the current bill -- has received $4.3 million in contributions from business PACS, more than 2.5 times what he took in from labor.
Casey: Bill Protecting Worker Rights More Necessary in Recession
March 10, 2009
WASHINGTON, DC- Following a Health, Education, Labor and Pensions hearing today on Rebuilding Economic Security: Empowering Workers to Restore the Middle Class, U.S. Senator Bob Casey (D-PA) released the following statement:
“In my judgment, it is appropriate at this hearing to discuss the Employee Free Choice Act, but also the trauma that the American family is living through in this recession. We need to talk about helping to provide economic security for families who don’t have it. One of the best ways to ensure economic security for workers and their families is for that worker to be a member of a union.
D.L. Hughley: Frank Schaeffer Author of Crazy for God on What's Left of the GOP
I can walk down the street with my head held high knowing I'm not affiliated with a party whose public position is that my president and country should fail just to make their point.
Frank Schaeffer Author of Crazy for God: How I Grew Up as One of the Elect, Helped Found the Religious Right, and Lived to Take All (or Almost All) of It Back visits D.L. Hughley to talk about What's Left of the GOP :
I've been a bit of a left-wing rabble-rouser for a few years now, and I can attest that no one in that movement ever prayed for George W. Bush to fail. (Drop dead, maybe.) We did not want him to fail in Iraq. We prayed that he would find the wisdom to choose a different course, but when that didn't work out, that he would spare the lives of countless Iraqis and US soldiers and cease hostilities as soon as possible. We would have all sat down and shut-up if our troops had, in fact, been greeted as liberators and not as occupiers, and the caches of WMD that President Reagan had sold to Saddam Hussein had been found. No one would have been happier to be wrong than I. Anyone that tells you otherwise is prevaricating, to be polite.
We didn't have to do anything, it turns out, to ensure Bush's failure. He saw to that himself.
Mr. Schaeffer's letter to Republicans as published on The Huffington Post:
Dear Republican Leaders: The Republican Party has become the party dedicated to sabotaging the American future. Check out the sermon I just delivered about the Republican Party on CNN when being interviewed by D.L. Hughley -- and/or read on.
The Labor Friendly President
Andy Stern, the president of SEIU, is quoted as saying that the greatest social program in history was the United States union movement. That nothing raised the standard of living of more people and it didn't cost the government a dime.
It would seem that President Obama agrees. From today's Philadelphia Inquirer:
On other topics, Obama said he would not urge a delay in consideration of the Employee Free Choice Act, legislation sought by organized labor that would make it easier for unions to win the right to represent workers.
Business groups are fiercely opposed, saying that the bill - which would allow unions to be certified by workers' signatures, without a secret ballot, and would require arbitration - would increase costs.
"I don't buy the argument that providing workers with collective-bargaining rights somehow weakens the economy or worsens the business environment," Obama said. "If you've got workers who have decent pay and benefits, they're also customers for business."
Sign Up for Green Fish
From Joy Sabl, Democracy for Pittsburgh:
Just because "our" team is now in office, that doesn't mean the need
for oversight disappears. Even if this is not "your" big issue,
consider signing the petition to make it clear that we're staying on
the ball.
As a biologist and also as a diver, I can vouch for the bad effects of
"open" aquaculture. Even so-called "organic aquaculture" methods
(involving lower fish densities) do not address the basic problems.
These are nutrient runoff from food and feces; serving as an
unintentional culture medium for blooms of viruses, bacteria and
parasites that harm wild populations (particularly destructive to tiny
wild fry that would not otherwise encounter large parasites until
later in life); and the escape of farmed fish into wild populations,
compromising the quality and genetic diversity of wild fish.
This "heads up" came today. Please consider signing.
http://www.care2.
Our wild pacific salmon fisheries are the best-managed in the world.
There are movements afoot to revive other US fisheries by properly
managing wild stocks. With overfishing of many species, we are at a
crossroads: we can commit to healthy oceans, healthy fish stocks and
managed fishing plans (which will allow the oceans to feed us if we
treat them well). Or we give up on the oceans, and the wild fish
stocks, and use the sea as a convenient location for pens of fish that
have to be artificially bred and fed. For more, see here:
http://community.
Until well into this century, salmon was so plentiful, easy to fish
and cheap that there were rules that workers could not be fed salmon
more than 3 times a week. Salmon was also used as dog food and
fertilizer. If we treat rivers and oceans and fish populations well,
they will rebound to feed us amply.
P.S. Farmed tilapia and catfish are fine, as far as effects on wild
fish--those are closed, landlocked, freshwater ponds.
Farewell, W.
Juan Cole on Bush's swan song:
Friday, January 16, 2009
W.'s Twilight: A Man of Feeble Temper
W. said goodbye to us last night, in an appearance that was surely notable for most Americans mainly because of the annoyance that he delayed by fifteen minutes their prime time shows like Gray's Anatomy and Eleventh Hour.
The Bard reminds us that we cannot attribute the dominance of the unworthy ruler to fate, or the stars. If we diminish ourselves and make ourselves underlings and give up our birthright as free citizens, bowing down to a would-be emperor, then we ourselves must accept the blame.
"Ye gods, it doth amaze me,
A man of such a feeble temper should
So get the start of the majestic world,
And bear the palm alone. (1.2.129)
Why, man, he doth bestride the narrow world
Like a Colossus; and we petty men
Walk under his huge legs, and peep about
To find ourselves dishonourable graves.
Men at some time are masters of their fates:
The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars,
But in ourselves, that we are underlings. (1.2.135)"
PA's New Open Records Law
The Office of Open Records which oversees government compliance with the new law has established a website to make the process easier. You can find the Open Records website here:
http://openrecords.state.pa.us
Snipped from the Citizen's Guide on the open Records website:
The most significant change to the Right-To-Know Law is that all records are presumed to be public records unless disclosure is barred by: 1) state or federal law or regulation, or judicial order; or 2), privilege, e.g., attorney-client, doctor-patient, or 3) one of the exceptions in Section 708 of the Right-to-Know Law.
The burden is now 100 percent on the Agency to establish why the record is not available.
Commonwealth Agencies: Any office, department, authority or other parts of the executive branch, state-affiliated entities, independent agencies, and includes the Governor, Attorney General, Auditor General and the Treasury Department.
Local Agencies: Any political subdivision, intermediate unit, or charter, public trade or vocational school [or] any local, intergovernmental, regional or municipal agency, authority, council, board commission or similar governmental entity.
The Real Great Depression
The depression of 1929 is the wrong model for the current economic crisis
As a historian who works on the 19th century, I have been reading my newspaper with a considerable sense of dread. While many commentators on the recent mortgage and banking crisis have drawn parallels to the Great Depression of 1929, that comparison is not particularly apt. Two years ago, I began research on the Panic of 1873, an event of some interest to my colleagues in American business and labor history but probably unknown to everyone else. But as I turn the crank on the microfilm reader, I have been hearing weird echoes of recent events.
When commentators invoke 1929, I am dubious. According to most historians and economists, that depression had more to do with overlarge factory inventories, a stock-market crash, and Germany's inability to pay back war debts, which then led to continuing strain on British gold reserves. None of those factors is really an issue now. Contemporary industries have very sensitive controls for trimming production as consumption declines; our current stock-market dip followed bank problems that emerged more than a year ago; and there are no serious international problems with gold reserves, simply because banks no longer peg their lending to them.

Nationwide
